The Language of Recognition: Mandel&soft;&shachek;tam's Poetic Encounter with Batju&shachek;kov
Julia
Zarankin
Osip Mandel&soft;&shachek;tam's (1891–1938) encounter with
Konstantin Batju&shachek;kov (1787–1855) occurred in print as
early as 1912, continued throughout the poet's lifetime, through
borrowed rhymes, meters, a strong mutual interest in Italian imagery,
and reached its apex in Batju&shachek;kov, a poem written
in 1932, published as part of the Moscow Notebooks. How
does this encounter take shape? More than a few generation gaps
separate the two poets, but Lidija Ginzburg's definition of
early-nineteenth-century elegiac poetics as the poetics of
recognition
forges a bond between them. This paper intends to
trace how the evocation of Batju&shachek;kov creates an intricate
progression of sounds which unfolds into a patchwork of images and
time frames in Mandel&soft;&shachek;tam's poetry.
I would like to present Mandel&soft;&shachek;tam's encounter with
Batju&shachek;kov through the careful analysis of two poems: I
haven't heard the tales of Ossian (1914) and
Batju&shachek;kov (1932). The Ossian poem will provide a
poetic context for a later, more direct encounter with the elegiac
poet: the image of the skald pronouncing another's verse as his own
prefigures what for Mandel&soft;&shachek;tam will subsequently dare to
do in his later Batju&shachek;kov poem. When
Mandel&soft;&shachek;tam invokes Batju&shachek;kov directly in his
1932 poem, he supplements his direct quotations with metrical
imitation. Furthermore, the passages Mandel&soft;&shachek;tam chooses
to quote from Batju&shachek;kov are taken from poems which are, in
themselves, translations. This demonstrates another means of
connecting the Batju&shachek;kov to the Ossian poem, and reinforces
the act of bringing another's poem into one's own poetic sphere.
Mandel&soft;&shachek;tam's evocation of Batju&shachek;kov is a
moment of recognition: a meeting place of images, sounds, meters, and
finally a way of envisioning and expounding the paradoxical
relationship between poetic imitation and spontaneity, which forms an
integral part of his poetics.