At least since Miklosich it has been customary to view the
beginning of the dialectalization of Slovene from the isogloss for the
tandem diphthongization of long reflexes of
In recent years various pieces of research have led to a new interpretation of the dialectalization of the Sn and Kaj(kavian) territories. In particular, the orientation of the Sava River, which runs NW to SE, appears to be a determinant in the earliest dialectalization of the territory, which correlates with archeological data (Baran et al. 1990; Andersen forthcoming). The new picture that emerges is based in part on the following isoglosses and their chronological relationships:
1. Examples of Illi&chachek;-Svity&chachek;'s archaism (accentual paradigm D) are found to the S of the Sava River, thus conjoining the S portions of the Sn and Kaj speech territories (as well as N-&Chachek;a[kavian]).
2. Dialects that are innovative with respect to
Kri&zhachek;anić's Law (the retraction of post-Dybo's-Law
stress onto first long, then short pretonic vowels, e.g., NW
3. Areas with the
4. As demonstrated in Greenberg (forthcoming 1998) the precondition
for the dual reflexes of the jers is the retention of a labial reflex
of Common Slavic
5. Retraction of internal long falling stress to the preceding
syllable is found N of the Sava: Carinthian Sn, E-Sn and Kaj
Isoglosses 1–3 date to the pre-migration period and thus belong to the oldest layer of dialect differences in the Sn-Kaj territory. Isoglosses 4–5 are dialect archaisms that date to a period when Ssl still carried through common innovations and thus belong to a layer of innovations older than the internal differentiation of Sn-Kaj.
Isoglosses with a N-S bias are found primarily in NW-Sn and continue in N-Sl, e.g.,
6.
7.
8.
This set of isoglosses reflects the heterogeneity of the
populations settled along the N reaches of the Sava at a time when the
continuity between N-Sl and S-Sl had not yet been disrupted. Though
these isoglosses are old, they do not have correlates far outside the
Sn territory. The innovation in 6 is reaches only W-Sn and
N-&Chachek;a; 7 is limited to the NW portion of Sn; in 8 the
Later isoglosses that run SW-NE (roughly with Trieste forming the SW endpoint) are of two types:
At least one isogloss in SE-Sn stops S of the Sava:
9.
At least two significant isoglosses continue across the Sava, Drava and Mura Rivers to the end of the Sn speech territory, approximately at the point where the Austrian and Hungarian borders meet.
10.
11. *
The last isogloss is complex and may be particularly revealing for
the settlement history. The Sn territory is bisected by this isogloss
in a line running between Trieste and Maribor. NW of this isogloss is
an area where diphthongal reflexes give way to monophthongal (tense
The earliest history of Sn and Kaj, as reflected in dialect
geography, is defined by the heterogeneity of settlement along and on
either bank of the Sava River and by isoglosses that emanate from this
loci. The sharp dialect differentiation is not, as usually treated, a
result of later internal differentiation, but a mixture of archaic and
innovative features from the pre-migration period, onto which later
innovations (those traditionally considered early
in
the literature) are layered.
Selected References
Andersen, H. Forthcoming 1999.
Baran, V. D., E. V. Maksimov, B. B. Magomedov et al. 1990.
Dybo, V. A., G. I. Zamjatina, and S. L. Nikolaev. 1990.
Greenberg, M. L. Forthcoming 1998.
Ivić, P. 1958.
Rigler, J. 1963/1986.