Slot: 30A-4 Dec.
30, 8:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Panel: Publishing and Positioning in the
Fin-de-siècle
Chair: Jason Merrill, Michigan State University
Title: Dreyfus and Zola in Russia: The Engagé
Writer, the Poet as Prophet, and the Newspaper
Author: Gabriella Safran, Stanford University
Osip Mandelstam, in “Shum vremeni,” recalls the
1890s as a time when Russians – or at any rate Russian Jewish men – talked
exclusively about the Dreyfus Affair.
Indeed, the growth of newspaper publishing and global communications
technologies in that era meant that readers even in the Russian provinces could
follow daily developments in the story of the Jewish officer’s various trials,
convictions, and pardons and their aftermath in France and beyond. A more inspirational figure than the
colorless Alfred Dreyfus was Emile Zola, whose article “J’accuse!” and
subsequent libel trial led the French government (eventually) to admit the
army’s wrongdoing.
Aleksandra Brushteyn, in
her memoir of a Vilna girlhood, Doroga ukhodit v dal′..., paints Zola as a willing martyr, who
knew that his literary fame would make his self-sacrifice an effective public
statement, and she finds a contemporary Russian analogue to Zola’s activism in
Vladimir Korolenko’s work on behalf of the Multan Votiaks (an ethnic minority
accused of ritual sacrifice, 1892-1896).
This paper examines these and other echoes of Zola’s intervention in the
Dreyfus Affair in Russian literary life, asking whether Zola was read as an
exemplar of a pre-existing model for writerly heroism or a founder of a new,
productive literary-biographical model.
It argues that the changing perceptions of the heroic writer in Russia
cannot be separated from the evolution of publishing, particularly the
newspaper, itself seen as a vehicle just as capable of stifling heroism as of
nurturing and publicizing it.
Title: Hypostases of the Final Liberation:
Mystical Anarchism in the Context of the Political Satire Journal Adskaia
Pochta
Author: Oleg A. Minin, University of Southern
California
The doctrine of mystical anarchism,
elaborated upon by G. Chulkov and V. Ivanov in their respective tracts On
Mystical Anarchism, The
Idea of the Non-Acceptance of the World and The Crisis of Individualism, found its peculiar manifestation in Adskaia
Pochta – a journal of
political satire published in 1906 by Evgeny Lansere.
This study,
while re-examining the principal tenets of mystical anarchism, focuses on the
way the doctrine manifests itself in Lansere’s journal. It will be argued that
satire in Adskaia pochta,
functioning as a vehicle of social criticism, also acts as the conduit for mystic anarchism’s non-acceptance of
the world rhetoric, which, in turn, dominates the journal’s overall
meta-narrative.
The notion of
prophesy, which repeatedly surfaces in Ivanov’s and Chulkov’s tracts in
connection with mystical anarchism, is the seminal notion of Ivanov’s poem Syvilla, published in Adskaia pochta’s inaugural issue. A close reading of
this poem ultimately advances the argument that the journal’s meta-narrative
was dialogically constructed to accommodate a unitary voice of mystical
anarchist protest.
Methodologically,
the present study will proceed from Mikhail Bakhtin’s notion of dialogism,
which operates at the level of the journal’s meta-narrative, reflecting its
orientation toward a liberally colored agenda of social criticism.
References
Adskaia pochta, Issues 1-3, St. Petersburg, 1906.
Bahktin, Mikhail. "Discourse in the
Novel," The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin:
University of Texas Press, 1981.
Chulkov, Georgii. “O mistickeskom anarkhizme.” Valtasarovo tsarstvo. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Respublika,” 1998. 342-360.
Ivanov, Viacheslav. Po zvezdam. Stat’i i aforizmy. St. Petersburg:
Izdatel’stvo “Ory,” 1909.
Rosenthal, Bernice G.
“The Transmutation of the Symbolist Ethos: Mystical Anarchism and the
Revolution of 1905.” Slavic Review 36. 4 (December 1977): 608-628.
Title: Scandal as a Strategy of Literary
Conduct: Rozanov, Vekhi,
and Others
Author: Natalia Kazakova, Hunter College
The Silver Age proposed definite
behavioral connotations to Russian society. The eschatological historical
context demanded an ontological approach to life; play was transformed into the
foundational principle of living and being. Vasilii Rozanov stood out even
among his brilliant contemporaries by proposing a new model of creative
existence. The disputatious conduct of Rozanov – thinker, journalist, and
writer – was conditioned by a defined strategy in his creative
self-understanding. Scandal became the supreme metaphorical manifestation of
his literary identity.
The anthology Vekhi (articles on the Russian intelligentsia)
appeared in the beginning of March 1909. No other book published in Russia in
the early twentieth century met with such violent discussion. Its unbelievable success was the
success of a grandiose scandal. The anthology’s critical reflection in
addressing the Russian intelligentsia did not, paradoxically, meet with a
proper understanding in its milieu.
The
religious-philosophical group headed by Merezhkovskii, Gippius, and Filosofov
responded to the anthology extremely negatively. Rozanov, however – who had by
then already received a reputation for scandal – spoke in defense of the
“children of Dostoevsky,” as he called the authors of Vekhi. Rozanov’s distinctive polemical defense
and the specificity of his arguments initiated a break with Merezhkovski’s
group. Rozanov’s confrontation exposed deep contradictions in the spiritual
growth of Russian society and stand as a reflection of this epoch’s tragic
conflict.